Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant: Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated et al v. Google, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06794
Plaintiff: Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated, J.O. Emmerich & Associates, Inc., Delta-Democrat Publishing Company and others
Defendant: Google LLC and Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff: Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party: The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated et al v. Google, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00274
Defendant: Facebook, Inc. and Google, LLC
Plaintiff: Kosciusko Star-Herald, Inc., Clarke Publishing, Inc., Marion Publishing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Curtis v. Microsoft et al
as 2:2018cv03291
Defendant: Epic Games Incorporated, Microsoft, Blizzard Entertainment Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Adam Josiah Curtis and Adam Josiah Curtis doing business as SecureTek Computer doing business as Aj's Computer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Seattle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Amicus Curiae: ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DAN CLARK, TAMI DUNLAP, ALI HASSON, JENNIFER IMMEL, GARY KUNZE, ELISABETH LOWE, DALE MONTZ, ABDI MOTAN, FREDERICK RICE, MICHAEL RIEBS, and FIREW TESHOME. and LYFT, INC.
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem LTD., et al
as 17-15857
Plaintiff - Appellee: KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Objector - Appellant: PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee: LG CHEM LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION and others
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem Ltd., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15795
Plaintiff - Appellee: KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?