Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tesla v. Louisiana Automobile Dealers
as 23-30480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tesla, Incorporated, Tesla Lease Trust and Tesla Finance, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Automobile Dealers Association, In itself and on behalf of its members, executive committee, and board of directors, Gregory Lala, In his official capacity as Chairman of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission, Allen O. Krake, In his Official capacity as a Commissioner of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission and his private capacity and others
Tesla Inc. et al v. Louisiana Automobile Dealers Association et al
as 2:2022cv02982
Plaintiff:
Tesla Inc., Tesla Lease Trust, Tesla Finance, LLC and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Automobile Dealers Association, Gregory Lala, Allen O Krake and others
Petitioner:
Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LINCOLN ADVENTURES LLC et al v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON MEMBERS OF SYNDICATES et al
as 2:2008cv00235
In Re:
INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
STEPHEN G. AQUILINA, LUCIANA J. AQUILINA, AUDRA M. LANE and others
Plaintiff:
LINCOLN ADVENTURES LLC and MICHIGAN MULTI-KING INC
Defendant:
THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON MEMBERS OF SYNDICATES, MARSH PRIVATE CLIENT SERVICES, MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Maxon Hyundai Mazda et al v. Carfax, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02680
Plaintiff:
Westbury Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc., Fitzgerald Toyota Inc., Union Pontiac- GMC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02796
Defendant:
: German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, Audi of America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Briscoe, Marilyn Fong, Travis Burton and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert B. Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MDL No. 1917 In Re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007cv05944
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., Janet Ackerman, James E. Allee and others
Defendant:
Technicolor S.A, Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Company, Ltd. and others
Respondent:
Alan Frankel
Interested Party:
Wettstein & Sons, Inc, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics Americas, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Illinois, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division and State of Oregon
Other:
Douglas W. St. John, Donnie Clifton, Harry Garavanian and others
Not Yet Classified:
State of Connecticut, YRC, INC., Douglas A. Kelley and others
Special Master:
James Larson, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, Honorable Charles A. Legge and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Rich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Newton et al v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 3:2017cv06462
Plaintiff:
Renee Newton , Oren Arbit , Biltrite Furniture, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, BMW of North America LLC, Daimler Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NEWTON et al v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2017cv07267
Plaintiff:
RENEE NEWTON , OREN ARBIT , BILTRITE FURNITURE, INC. and others
Defendant:
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DAIMLER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Findlay Industries, Inc. et al v. Panasonic Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12338
Plaintiff:
Findlay Industries, Inc. and Saratoga Lane LLC
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Mitsuba Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Electric Power Steering - Direct Purchaser Actions
as 2:2013cv01901
Plaintiff:
Saratoga Lane, LLC
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, JTEKT Automotive North America, Inc., Showa Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
