Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01364
Plaintiff: RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC, MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Defendant: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant: Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court: Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant: Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner: James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc. v. Braintree Laboratories Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00142
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc., Meijer Inc., Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc. and others
Defendant: Braintree Laboratories Inc.
Special Master: B. Wilson Redfearn, -SM-
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ferring B.V. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2005cv02237
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Ronald L. Seamon
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., Vista Healthplan, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Helen Seamon
Defendant: Ferring B.V., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Third Party Payors
Not Classified By Court: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 15-1290
Plaintiff - Appellee: BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., JUDITH CARRASQUILLO, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors and others
Defendant - Appellant: ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Movant: CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party: COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.
as 14-215
Plaintiff - Appellee: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and others
Appellant: Humana Inc., Aetna Inc. and WellPoint Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Ferring B.V. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Objector - Appellant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and others
In re: ADDERALL XR ANTITRUST We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant: Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Value Drug Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc.
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. et al v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD.
as 3:2013cv00353
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. , KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. , BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. and others
Defendant: DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc. v. Shire LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03711
Plaintiff: Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.
Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company Inc. v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 1:2011cv11024
Plaintiff: Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company Inc.
Defendant: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?