Cases 101 - 110 of 6,278
Michael Steele v. Bank of America, National Association
as 5:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
Michael Steele
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McMorris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Jason McMorris
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Block Inc. doing business as Cash App
Hatch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
as 5:2023cv06717
Plaintiff:
Bradford Hatch
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
City Of New York v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Receiver:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Signature Bank
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 FDIC: Insurance Funds
Conover et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 6:2023cv02427
Plaintiff:
John Scott Conover, Tina Conover, Samantha Conover and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, John Jr Conover and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Elia v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Dr. Souheil Elia, Samar Yasser Hafza, Dr. Souheil E. Elia and others
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Tian v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Gengcai Tian
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
TORO v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Trustmark National Bank
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Thompson
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rubenstein et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 1:2024cv10187
Plaintiff:
Chris Rubenstein
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
