Cases 91 - 100 of 139
FLETCHER v. HUD
as 1:2014cv01858
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER
Defendant:
HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. HUD et al
as 2:2014cv01317
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES
Defendant:
HUD and ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Morton Comprehensive Health et al
as 4:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
Marc Dewayne Howell
Defendant:
Morton Comprehensive Health, Tulsa Co Sheriff, The, Tulsa Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reitz v. Dept. of Hud et al
as 3:2014cv00625
Defendant:
Dept. of Hud and Federal Government - President
Plaintiff:
Robin Mark Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
O'Connor v. HUD, et al
as 3:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carolyn E. O'Connor
Defendant:
HUD, The Office of Housing Choice Vouchers, Resident Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santiago v. NYCHA et al
as 1:2014cv01720
Plaintiff:
Mildred Santiago
Defendant:
NYCHA, NYC Housing Court/Civil Court (Harlem), Jefferson Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence v. Fulton et al
as 1:2013cv02852
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Lawrence
Defendant:
Craig Fulton, Section 8, HUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lynn Gavin v. Bartholomew Murphy, et al
as 13-15622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN GAVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARTHOLOMEW MURPHY, MICHAEL J. ANTONINI, RICH HILLIS and others
Lawrence v. Fulton et al
as 1:2013cv02297
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Lawrence
Defendant:
Craig Fulton, Section 8, HUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Simmons et al v. Rockford Housing Authority et al
as 3:2013cv50009
Plaintiff:
Myron Simmons and Tyisha Smith
Defendant:
Rockford Housing Authority, U.S. Housing & Urban Development Agency(HUD) , Kevin Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
