Cases 111 - 120 of 123
Stephenson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
Charlene A Stephenson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wayne Dunn v. Michael Astrue
as 08-1681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE E. DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Tobin et al v. Burlison et al
as 3:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Karen Marie Tobin, Charles Pirro, Pirro & Church LLC and others
Defendant:
Eileen Burlison and Commissioner of Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Larkin v. Smith et al
as 3:2007cv01208
Plaintiff:
Diane Larkin
Defendant:
Pat Smith, John Nixon, Northeast Florida State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv01522
Plaintiff:
Brent D Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Mills S. Anthes v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv07127
Plaintiff:
Mills S Anthes
Defendant:
The United States of America, -, The Commissioner of Social Security and ALJ E. M. Koldewey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv01746
Plaintiff:
Juanita Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Spahr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2007cv00882
Plaintiff:
Marcia Spahr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Machado v. CSS
as 1:2007at00299
Plaintiff:
Rick Machado
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Catherine G. Ratliff v. Michael J. Astrue
as 07-2317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Catherine G. Ratliff
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
