Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Bolduc v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Crystal Bolduc
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodriguez Perez v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
David Webb v. James Hall, et al
as 22-3267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY JAMES P. HALL, Co-owner, KIMBERLY A. PARKS, Legal Assistant, MARY F. FITZPATRICK, Legal Assistant and others
Alexandre et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Luciano Alexandre, Christine Louise Johnson, Eric Nelson and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kirsha Brown v. Coca-Cola, et al
as 22-12176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIRSHA BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA COMPANY, SPRITE, AMAZON.COM, INC. and others
Huang v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Bai Lin Huang
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IbnTalal v. The Supreme Court of New York
as 22-394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Najma IbnTalal
Defendant / Appellee:
The Supreme Court of New York County, The Town of Islip, Brentwood Free School District and others
IbnTalal v. The Supreme Court of New York County et al
as 1:2022cv01476
Plaintiff:
Najma IbnTalal
Defendant:
The Supreme Court of New York County, The Town of Islip, Brentwood Free School District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brenda Johnson v. USA, et al
as 22-35044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
