Cases 11 - 20 of 70
HAREWOOD-BEY et al v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
DIANA HAREWOOD-BEY, LISA WARBUTON-EL and FEDERATION MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkman v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
Darryl Parkman
Defendant:
Bill Wolfe, Rob Grimm, Justin Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doye v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
De'Lano Doye
Defendant:
Bill Bechtold, Michele Weller, Melyssa Flud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv01486
Defendant:
James L. Brennan, Jr., Tiffany S. Kominski, F. J. Monaghan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Conway, Michael C. Morris and Stephen G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. BAKER et al
as 2:2019cv01439
Defendant:
KAYLEE BOYKIN, ANGELA WILSON and BILL JOHN BAKER
Plaintiff:
JEROME WAYNE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MOLSON v. DISANTIS et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant:
MARCEL MALLORY, JUDGE JOHN GAHART, MARK SAUDER and others
Plaintiff:
ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERR et al v. NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al
as 4:2019cv00215
Plaintiff:
Grace M. Derr, William J. Derr and Stephen A. Derr
Defendant:
NOURTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Cathy Gemberling, KIMBERLY BEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
