Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Davis v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2011cv05583
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Thurston County , Thurston County Office of Assigned Counsel and Sally Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zarate v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv07809
Plaintiff:
Felix Zarate
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Christoph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv06958
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PISAREK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jerry et al
as 1:2010cv07601
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Derrick Jerry and Officer Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Davis et al
as 4:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Russell
Defendant:
Christopher Davis , Steven Brophey , Donald Hyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Bangs et al
as 2:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Thomas Claude Atkins
Defendant:
Keith Bangs, Neal Walden, Christopher Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Davis v. Stephen Malitzki, Jr., et al
as 10-1903
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN B. MALITZKI, JR., Individually & In His Official Capacity As A Detective In The Bethlehem Township Police Department
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM
Davis v. Dennis et al
as 1:2009cv02135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis
Defendant:
Jim Dennis, Ron Kuckuck, Three Unknown Named White Male Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. MALITZKI et al
as 5:2009cv00739
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN B. MALITZKI, JR., BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mecca v. Davis et al
as 3:2008cv00716
Plaintiff:
Constance Mecca and Constance Mecca
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, City of Scranton, David Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
