Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Mallouk v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv03772
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Goode et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv09093
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Goode and Ann-Marie Roman
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, P.O. Paula Aguero, Starbucks Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Silas Braxton v. Starbucks, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04079
Plaintiff:
Silas Braxton
Defendant:
Starbucks, Inc., DOES 1-20, inclusive, Starbucks Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Boyle v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv06011
Plaintiff:
Brie Boyle and Brian Boyle
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rex Miller v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv07034
Plaintiff:
Rex Miler
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Freddy Ambriz and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Utah v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv10733
Plaintiff:
Paul Utah
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, All Hospitals and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Grant v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv05606
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
DOES 1 through100, Jacqueline Cruz, Starbucks Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv01487
Plaintiff:
HAROLD STANLEY JACKSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Day v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv00496
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Supreme Court, Dadri-Anne A. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Grant v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv08927
Defendant:
City of Hawthorne, Does 1 through 100 and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
