Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Bryant v. Doe
as 4:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Donald Bryant
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 6:2017cv06008
Plaintiff:
Hal W. Stanley and Michelle Stanley
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson , Arkansas Department of Human Services , Cindy Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore-Jones v. Arkansas State Police et al
as 4:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Jerica Moore-Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Todd Quick and Bill Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bivens v. Bryant, City of
as 4:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
Mary Bivens doing business as B&M Mobile Home Park
Defendant:
Bryant, City of
Counter Defendant:
Mary Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant et al v. Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Delois Bryant, Rosie Bryant, Lynda Bryant Charles and others
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leewright v. Ward, City of et al
as 4:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Rusty Leewright
Defendant:
Ward, City of, David Newman, Austin, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant et al v. Faulkner County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00458
Plaintiff:
William E Bryant and Adele Kinney
Defendant:
Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock, Everett Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scoggins v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Carl Scoggins
Defendant:
Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of, Uless Wallace, Travis Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Forrest City, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Claud Gaines
Defendant:
Forrest City, City of, Dwight Duke, EP Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. USA
as 4:2013cv00376
Plaintiff:
Donald A Bryant
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
