Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Hofer et al v. Emley et al
as 3:2019cv02205
Defendant:
Getaround, Inc., Brandon Gant, William Odom and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hofer and Brian Hofer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Liviz v. Gants
as 1:2019cv10644
Defendant:
Chief Justice Ralph D. Gants
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liviz Sr., et al. v. Gants et al
as 1:2019cv10462
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr. and Ilya Liviz, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Justice Ralph D. Gants, John Doe, Justice Barbara A. Lenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishay et al v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv12610
Defendant:
Real Estate Growth Fund, LLC, Jon Freeman, Michael P. Giunta and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Bishay and Bahig Bishay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hofer v. Emley et al
as 3:2018cv07580
Plaintiff:
Brian Hofer
Defendant:
W Odom, K Emley, Defendant Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reade v. Gants et al
as 1:2018cv12514
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Rufo, Barbara A. Lenk, Assistant Clerk John Dale and others
Plaintiff:
William F Reade, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gant v. Idaho Veteran's Network et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Defendant:
Department of Health & Welfare Staff, Wal-Mart of Boise, 4th District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Jace Russell Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gant v. Murray et al
as 3:2018cv01196
Defendant:
Saint Thomas Hospital, Ascension Health and Dr. Matthew Murray
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. CITY OF BRIDGEPORT PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 3:2018cv01606
Defendant:
THOMAS ERRICHETTI, DONALD GREENBERG, James O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
L et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv11674
Defendant:
Kristyn Snyer McKenna, THE GENERAL COURT, Governor Charlie Baker and others
Plaintiff:
CHLOE L, KATIE L, UDAYA L and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
