Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Jones v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01254
Plaintiff:
Marvin K. Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sacramento County Department of Child Support Services, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Edwards et al
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Diaz Chavez
Defendant:
TFC, F.H Edwards, Andrew S. Arnold, Esq., Gregory K. Jones, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Quick et al
as 1:2013cv02578
Plaintiff:
Wayne Andrews
Defendant:
Gary Quick, Timothy Geithner, Douglas Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McConnell v. Butler County Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Holly Candace McConnell
Defendant:
Butler County Ohio, Butler County Board of County Commissioners, Richard K Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv10271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Jones
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Sgt. Jones and Village Of Matteson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv09494
Plaintiff:
Jeanelle Hughes
Defendant:
Sandra K Jones and Pamela M. Foster-Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JONES v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
DARYL K JONES
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, CORIZON HEALTH INC, HAU THIEN HUYHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Huber, et al., et al
as 12-1171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY GEITHNER, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, OFFICER IN CHARGE OF COLLECTIONS and others
Mary K Jones v. City of Culver City et al
as 2:2011cv09196
Defendant:
City of Culver City, City of Culver City Police Department, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mary K Jones
Mitchell v. Hamilton City of et al
as 1:2011cv00764
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Hamilton City of, Bret Britt, Neil R. Ferdelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
