Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
M.R. et al v. New York City Department Of Education
as 1:2017cv03475
Plaintiff: M.R. , M. S. , S. G. and others
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
M.R. et al v. New York City Department Of Education
as 1:2017cv02077
Plaintiff: M.R. and S.R.
Defendant: New York City Department Of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Chaim Kaplan, et al v. Central Bank of Iran, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant: Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, also known as Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Bank Saderat, Iran, Bank Saderat, PLC and others
Special Master - Appellee: Alan L. Balaran
M.R. et al v. ROSSIG et al
as 2:2016cv03383
Plaintiff: M.R. and R.N.
Defendant: CHRISTIE ROSSIG , JOHN PUCCIO , P. ERIK GUNDERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
M.R. v. CURRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01305
Plaintiff: M.R.
Defendant: PAMELA CURRY, THOMAS CURRY, JENNIFER OLEXSAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COPE, et al v. KS State Board of Education, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant: COPE, AKA Citizens for Objective Public Education, CARL REIMER, MARY ANGELA REIMER and others
Defendant - Appellee: KANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, JANET WAUGH, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in her official capacity only, STEVE ROBERTS, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in his official capacity and others
Petrella, et al v. Brownback, et al
as 14-3023
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE PETRELLA, next friend and guardian of minor N.P., minor C.P., NICK PETRELLA, Next friend and guardian of minor N.P., MICHELLE TROUVE', next friend and guardian of minor J.T., minor Z.T., minor N.T. and others
Defendant - Appellee: SAM BROWNBACK, Governor of Kansas, in his official capacity, DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his official capacity, DIANE DEBACKER, in her official capacity as Kansas Commissioner of Education and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: EVETTE HAWTHORNE-CROSBY, next friend and guardian of minor B.C., JOY HOLMES, next friend and guardian of minor J.H., JIM HOLMES, next friend and guardian of minor J.H. and others
M.R. et al v. Pirate's Dinner Adventure et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00059
Defendant: 7600 Beach Boulevard Investors, LLC and Pirate's Dinner Adventure
Plaintiff: M.R., Arnie Pike and Marilynn Pike
Petrella, et al v. Brownback, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3334
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE PETRELLA, next friend and guardian of minor N.P., minor C.P., NICK PETRELLA, Next friend and guardian of minor N.P., MICHELLE TROUVE', next friend and guardian of minor J.T., minor Z.T., minor N.T. and others
Defendant - Appellee: SAM BROWNBACK, Governor of Kansas, in his official capacity, DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his official capacity, DIANE DEBACKER, in her official capacity as Kansas Commissioner of Education and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: EVETTE HAWTHORNE-CROSBY, next friend and guardian of minor B.C., JOY HOLMES, next friend and guardian of minor J.H., JIM HOLMES, next friend and guardian of minor J.H. and others
Norsworthy v. Jacksonville Sheriff John H. Rutherford et al
as 3:2013cv00770
Plaintiff: Henry L. Norsworthy
Defendant: Jacksonville Sheriff John H. Rutherford, Officer S.T. Stevenson and Officer M.R. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?