Cases 41 - 50 of 1,494
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Heather Santiago v. Shawn Swain, et al
as 24-11395
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SANTIAGO
Defendant:
SHAWN SWAIN, Officer, JIM GODWIN, Officer and PHILLIP SELLERS, Deputy
Thomas v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Thomas
Defendant:
United States District Court and District of New Mexico Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamdi Mohamud v. Heather Weyker
as 24-1875
Plaintiff:
Hamdi A. Mohamud
Defendant:
Heather Weyker, in her individual capacity as a St. Paul Police Officer
Ladera Taxpayers for Integrity in Governance v. Las Lomitas Elementary School District et al
as 3:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Ladera Taxpayers for Integrity in Governance
Defendant:
Las Lomitas Elementary School District, Las Lomitas Elementary School District Governing Board, Beth Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisen v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Nueces County, Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swanson et al v. Hilgers et al
as 4:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Heather Swanson and Oneida Health, LLC
Defendant:
Mike Hilgers and Charity Menefee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Menze v. County of Otter Tail et al
as 0:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Aaron O. Menze
Defendant:
County of Otter Tail, Wayne Stein and Heather Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Valenzuela (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Heather Valenzuela
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
