Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Graham v. Bernard et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. See 7:16-cv-257-BO.
as 4:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Graham
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt, Michael A Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melvin v. Bernard et al. Don't docket anything in this case. New Case # 7:16-cv-275-D.
as 4:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jerry O Melvin
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt, Michael A. Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03838
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ALEXANDER MCCORD and JOHN/JANE DOES 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOGGS v. HANDWERK et al
as 2:2016cv03022
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BOGGS
Defendant:
HANDWERK, GREGORY, FAIRCHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raimey v. Edwards et al
as 2:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Raimey
Defendant:
Rose Edwards , Harlis J. Thompson, Jr. , Suseela Nalluri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL
as 1:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCray v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Alexander McCray
Defendant:
The City Of New York and NYPD P.O. John/Jane Does #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Williams
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Ricardo Bocachica, Police Officer UCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peeples v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06511
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Friendly, P.O. John/Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Katrina Peeples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gadpaille v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08302
Plaintiff:
Tomi Gadpaille
Defendant:
City Of New York and John & Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
