Cases 61 - 70 of 209
O'Rourke v. King et al
as 4:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
Scott O'Rourke
Defendant:
David King , Steven Burle , Ari B Zelmanow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thiel v. Korte et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Thiel
Defendant:
Stephen Korte, Josh Baker and Joseph Minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wal-Mart et al
as 4:2016cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Clark
Defendant:
Richard Sher, Wal-Mart and Seth Webb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Meier v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2016cv01549
Defendant:
St. Louis, Missouri, City of , Doc's Towing, Inc. , Richard H. Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Mary R Meier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hershey v. The Curators of the University of Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv01229
Defendant:
The Curators of the University of Missouri , Michael A Middleton , Henry C Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Hershey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sloan v. Phelps County, Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Sloan
Defendant:
Phelps County, Missouri , Richard Lisenbe , Greg Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Dotson et al
as 4:2015cv01845
Defendant:
Dewight M. Meeks , Steven P. Wilson , Lori J. Rebholz and others
Plaintiff:
Chad J. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. Keedy et al
as 5:2015cv06162
Defendant:
Thomas Keedy, Tim Corwin, Scott Probasco and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lynn Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodhull v. Mascarella et al
as 6:2015cv03450
Plaintiff:
Angela V. Woodhull
Defendant:
Shirley Mascarella, Toby S. Monaco, Richard C. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren et al v. Piedmont, Missouri, City of et al
as 1:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Tina Warren and Bryan Jeffers
Defendant:
Piedmont, Missouri, City of, William Kirkpatrick, Richard Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
