Cases 61 - 70 of 3,257
Wilcox v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Wilcox
Defendant:
Gregg L. Alexander and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jackson
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Steven R Smith
Defendant:
Arkanas, State of, Pulaski County Arkansas, Does John and Jane 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bracey v. McCoy
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bracey
Defendant:
Rusty McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Marion County et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marion County and Jim Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Maskell v. Kemp et al
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
John Dan Kemp, Cody Hiland, Courtney Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Carol Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Wealth Management/Arvest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
