Cases 71 - 80 of 443
Williams v. Walmart Inc.
as 6:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Effie Williams
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. WalMart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Raquel Davis
Defendant:
WalMart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robinson v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Robinson
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Alan Doe and Rebecca Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LeSure v. Walmart Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Chandi LeSure
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Payano v. Walmart Inc.
as 8:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Giselle Payano
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
F. Robert Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02309
Plaintiff:
Jamie Davis
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Brosnan Risk Consultants, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Cuara Rodriguez v. Walmart Corporate Office et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walmart Corporate Office, National Gift Card, Woodforest National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
Nubia Acosta
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pakuja Vang v. Catawba Medical Center
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG
Defendant / Appellee:
CATAWBA MEDICAL CENTER, CATAWBA VALLEY FAMILY MEDICINE CLAREMONT, BETHANY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Juarez v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Victor Camargo Juarez
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
