Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Green v. Morris et al
as 1:2023cv02639
Plaintiff:
Alexander Walter Green
Defendant:
Bonifa Morris, Meredith Finch, Jeff Toton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. Boyer et al
as 1:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Amber T. Ellis
Defendant:
Mark Kenneth Boyer, Milton Kenneth Long, Jr., Viki M. Pauler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wright v. University of Maryland
as 8:2021cv01757
Plaintiff:
Julia Wright
Defendant:
University of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Morgan v. Wright
as 8:2021cv01526
Defendant:
Elizabeth G. Wright
Plaintiff:
Arthur C. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Wright v. IBM et al
as 1:2020cv03203
Defendant:
IBM, Taco Mac, Marriott Grande Vista, Orlando, FL and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Beckham et al
as 1:2019cv03438
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Human Services, Ms./Mrs. Queen, Executive Director Kevin P Guistwite and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nwoga v. Karceski et al
as 1:2019cv02899
Defendant:
Richard Karceski, Law Firm of Silverman, Thompson, Slutkin & White and Howard Schulman Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP
Plaintiff:
Susan Nwoga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Baltimore City Community College et al
as 1:2019cv02194
Defendant:
Lt. Freddie Deeraffinreid, President Debra L. McCurdy, Cpl. James Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Davis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spell v. Wright et al
as 1:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Nate Nuty, Deon Wright, Nate Duty and others
Plaintiff:
Julius L. Spell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Hill v. CBAC Gaming LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00695
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police, Jermaine Wright, CBAC Gaming LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dr Michael L Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
