Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Randle v. Avina
as 24-10286
Plaintiff:
Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant:
Cindy Avina, Individually and in her professional capacity
Randle et al v. The PNC Financial Services Group et al
as 4:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant:
The PNC Financial Services Group, PNC Bank, Cindy Avina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Kimberly White, VIRGINIA AVINA, State of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter
Not Yet Classified:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Enrique Avina v. Todd Bohlen, et al
as 17-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE AVINA, as parents and guardian of XXXX, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD BOHLEN, MIKE ROHDE, EDWARD A. FLYNN and others
Victor Manuel Avina v. City of Colton et al
as 5:2015cv02178
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Avina
Defendant:
City of Colton, City of Colton Police Department, DOES and others
Darrick Allen Molitor v. District Attorny Daniel Lester Dow et al
as 2:2015cv04661
Defendant:
Perry Abbott, Lt George A Avina, Attrny Andrew William Baird and others
Plaintiff:
Darrick Allen Molitor
Gabriel H Avina v. Robert M. Casey et al
as 2:2015cv01362
Plaintiff:
Gabriel H Avina
Defendant:
Robert M Casey, City of Culver City, Does and others
Avina-Luna v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2014cv01295
Defendant:
County of Sacramento , Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Scott R. Jones
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avina-Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avina-Luna v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2014at00684
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Scott R. Jones
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avina-Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avina F. v. Knee et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Defendant:
Art Acevedo and Stan Knee
Plaintiff:
Paulino Avina F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
