Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith et al v. Ainsworth et al
as 3:2022cv06093
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith, Brandy Smith and Benson Smith
Defendant:
Zachary Ainsworth, Jay Russell and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geiger et al v. G. et al
as 2:2022at00025
Plaintiff:
Yaphette Geiger, Jethro Geiger, Brandie Smith and others
Defendant:
K. G., N. G., County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agwu et al v. City and County of Denver, The, et al
as 1:2021cv02478
Plaintiff:
REBECCA AGWU, JESSE ANDERSEN, AZRIA ARROYO and others
Defendant:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, REECE HUNTER, ALFONSO CARRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Smith v. Betterton
as 5:2019cv01843
Plaintiff:
Brandi Smith
Defendant:
Bethany Betterton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JOHNSON et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv08596
Plaintiff:
JACK JOHNSON and REBECCA M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRANDY SMITH, CRYSTAL MURPHY, LISSETTE CHRISTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.M., et al v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 14-12010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C.M., by and through his next friend, Tracy Marshall, A.Q., by and through her next friend, Shawnita Quarles, S.G., by and through her next friend, Felicia Gant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, THOMAS R. BICE, Ed.D, in his official capacity as Alabama State Superintendent of Education, JULIE P. MAGEE, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Alabama and others
Harris v. Johnson, et al
as 12-6110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTOYA HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES JOHNSON and OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF JUVENILE AFFAIRS, ex rel. Central Oklahoma Juvenile Center
Defendant:
KIZZELL BROWN and BRANDY SMITH
Harris v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv01386
Plaintiff:
Montoya Harris
Defendant:
Kizzell Brown , Brandy Smith , James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
