Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Runge v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Roger Runge
Defendant:
Chief Eric D. Smith, Deputy Chief Chad Ochivzzo, Supervisor Ashlee Windler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dublin et al v. The City of Orlando et al
as 6:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Dublin, Gloria Dublin, Cynthia Dublin Clayton and others
Defendant:
The City of Orlando, Mayor Buddy Dyer, Commissioner Regina Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Battson et al v. Mays et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brittany R. Battson, Eric D. Smith, Taurin D. Wallace and others
Defendant:
Symphany Mays, J. Johnson, H. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Heath Dickson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2019cv06043
Defendant:
Hot Springs County, AR, 153-CPL Heath Dickson and Malvern Police Department
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COUNTY OF MARION
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv00725
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2009cv01092
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant:
JEFF WRIGLEY and DAVID L. ITTENBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant:
JEFF WRIGLEY and EDWARD G. BUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.