Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lu v. Budd, et al
as 21-1647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN LAFRAZIA, SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE, INC., KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD and others
Lu v. Budd et al
as 1:2021cv10352
Defendant:
Daniel P Sullivan, David Fredette, Methunion Manor Cooperative Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore v. Ballauer et al
as 1:2016cv06251
Plaintiff:
Cortez Moore
Defendant:
J. Ballauer, J. Cannon, D. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Taylor et al
as 3:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Cannon
Defendant:
City of Zachary, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karwel v. City of Palm Bay et al
as 6:2015cv00597
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kane Karwel
Defendant:
City of Palm Bay, Joseph Poteat, Sherry Poteat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Henre et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Henre, Sr. and Wilma K. Henre
Defendant:
Jason Allen, William Bais, B. Bunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrable v. Cannon et al
as 3:2013cv00590
Plaintiff:
James Marrable
Defendant:
J. Cannon, Rodriguez, Jose Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdul Rahim Janko v. Robert M. Gates, et al
as 12-5017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Al Janko
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Former Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Fmr. Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz, Fmr. Deputy Secretary of Defense and others
JENKO v. GATES et al
as 1:2010cv01702
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JENKO
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALLAITHI v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01677
Plaintiff:
SAMI ABDULAZIZ ALLAITHI
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, JAMES T. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
