Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MOSKOVITS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv02958
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MOSKOVITS
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marszalek v. Tony
as 0:2022cv60599
Plaintiff:
NINA MARSZALEK, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of RADOSLAW O. SKURZYNSKI, Deceased and Nina Marszalek
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony, Gregory Tony, SERGEANT W. WERNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster et al v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv01279
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Jacob Levitan, Elizabeth Schumacher and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIXON v. BARNES
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant:
REDMOND K. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00897
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JEFFREY ATKINS, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Hill
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , City of Atlanta Police Department , D. J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gist-Bell v. Olens et al
as 1:2011cv04377
Plaintiff:
Aquilla Gist-Bell
Defendant:
Samuel S. Olens, Laura W. McDonald, Annett M. Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Barnhill et al v. Strong et al
as 1:2007cv01678
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Barnhill and Catherine Nicole Donkers
Defendant:
Charles P. Strong, Jr., M. Kenneth Long, Jr., Arthur S. Rozes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
