Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Alim Ah Bey v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05166
Plaintiff:
Tanjy Alim Ah Bey
Defendant:
State of New York, Andrew Cuomo, Ben R. Barbato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caneda et al v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2017cv04794
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Caneda , Luis Antonio Diaz and Carmen Caneda
Defendant:
City Of New York, James Grzelak and John Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Castro et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2016cv02873
Plaintiff:
Maria Judith Diaz-Castro and W.C.D.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico , Juan J. Colon-Baez, Mario Rivera-Giegel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolon-Merced et al v. Pesquera et al
as 3:2014cv01757
Plaintiff:
Jillmarie Rolon-Merced , Joleydaliz Diaz-Rolon , Micaela I. Diaz-Rolon and others
Defendant:
Hector Pesquera, John Does 1-10 and Officer Cruz 30065
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Camacho-Morales v. Pesquera et al
as 3:2012cv01533
Defendant:
Hector Pesquera, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani, Emilio Diaz-Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Alwin Camacho-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Molina-Sarmiento et al v. Rodriguez
as 3:2009cv02247
Plaintiff:
Rubi Molina-Sarmiento and Luis Antonio Diaz-Ortega
Defendant:
Michael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mir-Yepez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 09-1926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON MIR-YEPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, LUIS A. DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ, C/P DIAZ-DOE CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DIAZ-DOE and others
Mir-Yepez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 08-1868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON MIR-YEPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, LUIS A. DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ and C/P DIAZ-DOE CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DIAZ-DOE
Diaz v. Coleman
as 4:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Colin Diaz and Jorge Luis Colin Diaz
Defendant:
Victor D Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
