Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniel Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, et al
as 22-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORTON SHORES, GARY NELUND, Mayor; individually and in his official capacity, DANIEL SHAW, Police Chief; individually and in his official capacity and others
Kirk-Bey v. NC DPS et al
as 5:2021ct03354
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdullah Kirk-Bey
Defendant:
NC DPS, Marci Crider, John Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2018cv01770
Plaintiff:
Mark Hughes and CORY HUGHES
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Dallas Police Department and City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cross v. Pay It Forward Animal Welfare Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
Al Cross
Defendant:
Pay It Forward Animal Welfare Network, Inc., Robin R. Dance, Jackie Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Brooks et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2009cv03343
Plaintiff:
Brianna M Brooks, Danessa J Brooks, Brenda Ann Clow-Brooks and others
Defendant:
Kevin Casanelli, County of San Joaquin, Ralph Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jude v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09125
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amatrone v. Benicia et al
as 2:2008at00903
Defendant:
City of Benicia, City of Benicia, Steve Messina and others
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Amatrone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Amatrone v. Messina et al
as 2:2008cv01831
Defendant:
City of Benicia, City of Benicia, Steve Messina and others
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Amatrone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rickert v. City of Poulsbo et al
as 3:2007cv05477
Plaintiff:
Mark Hugh Rickert
Defendant:
City of Poulsbo, City of Bainbridge Island, Daniel T LaFrance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
