Cases 1 - 10 of 456
McWashington v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Brandon McWashington
Defendant:
Brian G. Curtis, Noe Garza, Melissa A. Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 24-1759
Plaintiff:
CARL E. RODGERS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JEFFREY STINE, DEAN SHIPE and others
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Fosbinder v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Rodger Fosbinder
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Janet Elaine Patterson and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Ocampo v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ocampo
Defendant:
Illinois State Police and Adam W Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Freeman v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
Rodger Freeman
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYPD Detective John McDonald, NYPD Detective Christopher Obdyke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
