Cases 1 - 10 of 20
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 2:2021cv00256
Defendant:
TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 3:2021cv00094
Defendant:
TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MAYOR et al
as 1:2020cv01804
Defendant:
MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JON B KING, CHIEF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TED BELCHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jason Townsend
Defendant:
Timothy Hughes, James Arnold, Ted Butz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARRINGTON v. CITY OF KOKOMO et al
as 1:2017cv01539
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ARRINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, JEREMY DODD and TED SECREASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant:
MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ladyman v. Meade et al
as 3:2014cv02038
Plaintiff:
Craig C. Ladyman
Defendant:
Nicholas Meade , Ted Bohner , Arthur Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. BUCSHON et al
as 3:2014cv00130
Defendant:
REPRESENTATIVE LARRY BUCSHON, TOM CIBROWSKI, US SENATOR DAN COATS and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
