Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Rhodes v. Parklane Apartments, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01463
Defendant:
Fairfield Residential Company, LLC, Parklane Apartments, LLC and Fairfield Parklane, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Karen Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
U.S. Bank National Association v. Coloyan et al
as 4:2019cv00208
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Vicente Escala Coloyan and Karen Ibay Coloyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tyler v. Lopez
as 5:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Karen Lopez
Plaintiff:
Kimiesha Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caplan v. SKY PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv21802
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Sky Products International, Inc., Eugene W. Drody, Jr. and Karen K. Drody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Redmond Howard v. Edward Russo
as 18-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REDMOND HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD RUSSO, JORDAN GEIBEL and SCOTT HAMILTON
Defendant:
JEFFREY FLOYD, KAREN FLOYD and JONATHAN SCHMEDEL
Filho v. Gansen
as 4:2018cv00337
Plaintiff:
Roberto Filho
Defendant:
Karen Gansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malicoat v. Concepts in Community Living, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01796
Defendant:
Concepts in Community Living, Inc. and Karen Shenefelt
Plaintiff:
Alice Malicoat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
McCain et al v. Arndt et al
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Danielle McCain , Adelric McCain and H.O.P.E., Inc.
Defendant:
Karen Arndt, Sally Head, Marilyn Kroc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Howard v. Floyd et al
as 1:2016cv03948
Plaintiff:
Redmond Howard
Defendant:
Jeffrey Floyd, Karen Floyd, Edward Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daw v. The Siegel Group Nevada, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
Karen Daw
Defendant:
Nevadan Tower Holdings, LLC and The Siegel Group Nevada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
