Cases 1 - 10 of 38
WILLIAMS v. DEAL et al
as 3:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
LOUIS EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, B. J. Walker, CLARKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 99 U.S.C. § 9999
Janetta Sconiers v. California Department of Socia, et al
as 12-15405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANETTA L. SCONIERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, DENNIS BOYLE, FRESNO COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT and others
Charles Bobo v. Arizona Department of Economic
as 12-35134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES L. BOBO
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY
Case et al v. Corrigan
as 2:2011cv14298
Plaintiff:
Nicole Kelly , T. Z. , L. H. and others
Defendant:
Maura Corrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario-Vazquez v. Selles-Guerrini
as 3:2011cv01814
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Rosario-Vazquez
Defendant:
Arlene De Lourdes Selles-Guerrini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv01789
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Driscoll
Defendant:
Pamela Harris , James A. Nesom , Employment Development Department for State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv22833
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
United States of America , BP, Amoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bobo v. Arizona Dept. of Economic Security
as 2:2011cv01215
Plaintiff:
Charles L Bobo
Defendant:
Arizona Dept. of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gale et al v. Bremby
as 3:2011cv00972
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Gale , Walter R. Ehle and Althea M. Pagliaruli
Defendant:
Roderick L. Bremby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Charles Bobo v. State of Washington Department
as 11-35299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES L. BOBO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
