Cases 171 - 177 of 177
Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Delores Johnson and Delores Johnson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Lake Valley Retrievals, Inc., Lake Valley Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Unifund CCR Partners et al
as 1:2008at00025
Defendant:
Unifund CCR Partners, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Lake Valley Retrievals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Delores Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dicob et al v. Knuckles et al
as 7:2007cv01044
Plaintiff:
Robert Dicob and Cheryl Dicob
Defendant:
Mark R. Knuckles, JP Morgan Chase Bank as Trustee of the Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-1, Security National Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Greene v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tom E. Greene
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., Mann Bracken, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Diaz v. Alverez et al
as 3:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Humberto Diaz
Defendant:
Javier Alverez, Carmen I. Perez, Edward Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Unencumbered Assets Trust et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2004cv01090
Defendant:
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., Intercontinental Investment Associates, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and others
Interested Party:
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Erwin I. Katz, LTD and Unencumbered Assets Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In Re: National Century Financial Enterprises Inc Investment Litigation
as 2:2003md01565
Defendant:
Bank One National Association, Kuld Corp, Thomas G. Mendell and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Schrader, Michael Mahoney, Barbara Poulsen and others
In Re:
Fitch Inc, Thomas Mendell, Deloitte & Touche, LLP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
