Cases 1 - 10 of 158
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of Minnesota v. Azure et al
as 0:2023cv03321
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota
Defendant:
Evan Azure and Geno LeValdo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whittingham v. Tress et al
as 1:2023cv06058
Defendant:
Mark Tress, Moishe Tress, 1180 President Funding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Whittingham
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Garner v. Thomas Costello, et al
as 23-1519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, PHILIP COCOMISE and others
James Garner v. Thomas Costello, et al
as 23-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, PHILIP COCOMISE and others
James Garner v. Steven Kidd, et al
as 23-1194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO, STEVEN KIDD and others
James Garner v. Steven Kidd, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN KIDD, THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Boroja v. Le Roux et al
as 1:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Dragan Boroja
Defendant:
Alexander Le Roux, Evan Loomis, Jason Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Welker et al v. MiMedx Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04744
Plaintiff:
Troy Welker and Min Turner
Defendant:
MiMedx Group, Inc., J. Terry Dewberry, Charles R. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
