Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases
Dantes v. U.S. Department of Probation
as 1:2018cv24405
Defendant: U.S. Department of Parole and U.S. Department of Probation
Plaintiff: Edmond Dantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Turner v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv02050
Petitioner: James A Turner
Respondent: United States of America
Interpleader: US Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Quinny Thanh Nguyen v. United States Probation Officer for the Central District of California
as 8:2015cv01365
Petitioner: Quinny Thanh Nguyen
Respondent: United States Probation Office for the Central District of California
Quinny Thanh Nguyen v. United States Probation Officer for the Central District of California
as 2:2015mc00234
Petitioner: Quinny Thanh Nguyen
Respondent: United States Probation Office for the Central District of California
Tomlin v. United States Probation Office et al
as 0:2012cv60057
Defendant: United States Probation Office and United States Probation Officer
Plaintiff: Marcel Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nakamoto v. Kay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff: Kenneth K. Nakamoto
Defendant: Alan C. Kay and Probation Officer, U.S.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jernigan v. Dial et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00634
Plaintiff: Robert S. Jernigan
Defendant: Janice Dial, C. Douglas Thoresen, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gammon v. Assistant US Attorney et al
as 1:2007cv00333
Petitioner: Frank Joseph Gammon
Respondent: Assistant US Attorney, US Probation for the District of New Hampshire and Kristin Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Georgacarakos v. USA
as 4:2007cv01390
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: U.S. Probation - Williamsport Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?