Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Clyne v. Carlin
as 3:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent:
T Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HEATH v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv07270
Petitioner:
DANIEL HEATH
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William French v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Heath French
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC
(HC)Heath v. Warden at FCI Mendota
as 1:2022cv01529
Petitioner:
Randall Heath
Respondent:
Warden at FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kight v. Hooper
as 22-30737
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Heath Kight
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Clyne v. Warden Valley
as 1:2022cv00455
Petitioner:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Respondent:
Warden Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spikes v. Martin
as 2:2022cv02568
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Lumpkin
as 22-10733
Petitioner / Appellant:
Heath R. Barker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Spikes v. Martin
as 2:2022cv02294
Plaintiff:
James Jerrod Spikes, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
