Cases 11 - 20 of 649
Aburto v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01877
Petitioner:
Erik Flores Aburto
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bello-Flores v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2023cv02370
Petitioner:
Angel Bello-Flores
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin (PS) v. Flores
as 1:2023cv03183
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Ryan Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miguel Flores Jr. v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2023cv09998
Petitioner:
Miguel Flores, Jr.
Respondent:
Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORES v. EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
as 1:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
JUAN C. FLORES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-20565
Petitioner / Appellant:
Willie Medina, also known as Guillermo Flores Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
(HC) Flores v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv01587
Petitioner:
Felix Nacedo Flores
Respondent:
Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Derek Leon Marcus Smith v. Captain Flores
as 5:2023cv02220
Petitioner:
Derek Leon Marcus Smith
Respondent:
Captain Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 3:2023cv01196
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Flores (Holmes)
as 5:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Robert McKinnon, III
Respondent:
Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
