Cases 11 - 20 of 100
DeJesus v. USA
as 1:2022fp00462
Petitioner:
Alysha DeJesus
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Collins v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2022cv02509
Petitioner:
DeJesus Collins
Respondent:
State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reymond DeJesus-Rivera v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13143
Petitioner / Appellant:
REYMOND DEJESUS-RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Dejesus v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Orange County)
as 6:2022cv01601
Petitioner:
John Michael Dejesus
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeJesus v. Royce
as 1:2022cv07212
Petitioner:
Jaime DeJesus
Respondent:
Mark Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwin DeJesus v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 22-12431
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWIN DEJESUS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00514
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Stirling
as 2:2021cv03650
Petitioner:
Manuel Dejesus Solorza Hernandez
Respondent:
Brian P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeJesus v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and Warden of SCI-Mahanoy
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
