General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 239
Jermaine Lockett v. Ron Neal
as 18-1417
Petitioner - Appellant: JERMAINE M. LOCKETT
Respondent - Appellee: RON NEAL
LOCKETT v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00014
Petitioner: JOHN N. LOCKETT, III
Respondent: FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVANS v. LOCKETT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02619
Petitioner: ALFRED EVANS
Respondent: CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aljay Lockett, Jr. v. Warden, et al
as 17-13480
Petitioner - Appellant: ALJAY LOCKETT, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
LOCKETT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00119
Miscellaneou: BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: WARREN LOCKETT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Kennedy v. John Lockett, et al
as 17-11023
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD D. KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN R. LOCKETT, JOSEPH HEADLEY, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III and others
Kennedy v. Lockett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00028
Petitioner: Richard Daron Kennedy
Respondent: John R. Lockett, Joseph Headley and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Lockett et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00998
Plaintiff: Richard Daron Kennedy
Defendant: John R. Lockett, Joseph Headley and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00630
Petitioner: Jermaine M Lockett
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett, Jeremy v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00601
Plaintiff: Jeremy Lockett
Defendant: Cox , Waterman and J. Labelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?