Cases 21 - 30 of 3,266
Ivie v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05254
Petitioner:
Martin Stanley Ivie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent:
Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGinnis v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10712
Petitioner:
Scott Martin McGinnis
Respondent:
FBOP, FCI Elkton, Warden F. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Cutler
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Martin Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Cutler
as 1:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Martin Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Cutler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Rhett A Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
