General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Harris v. Daniels
as 5:2017hc02175
Petitioner: Harold Bright Harris, Jr.
Respondent: Faye Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRIGHT v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00385
Petitioner: TONY BRIGHT
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herman Bright v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme
as 17-12648
Petitioner - Appellant: HERMAN BRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
VEAL v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2017cv00128
Petitioner: ERIC VEAL
Respondent: GEORGIA STATE OF, RON BRAXLEY and FREDRIC D BRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Cobble v. District Attorney Fred Bright, et al
as 17-11126
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee: FRED BRIGHT, Baldwin County, BILL MASSEY, Baldwin County, KIMBERLY EASTERLING, AUSA and others
Daniel Cobble v. District Attorney Fred Bright, et al
as 17-10563
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee: FRED BRIGHT, District Attorney Baldwin County, BILL MASSEY, SHERIFF Baldwin County, KIMBERLY SANTEBA EASTERLING and others
Kenwood Bright v. Robert Stevenson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7317
Petitioner - Appellant: KENWOOD BRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN ROBERT STEVENSON
Blanton v. Olens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00124
Petitioner: Eric Mitchell Blanton
Respondent: Samuel Scott Olens, Therese S. Barnes and Stephen Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Blanton v. Olens et al
as 1:2016cv02944
Petitioner: Eric Mitchell Blanton
Respondent: Samuel Scott Olens, Therese S. Barnes and Stephen Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bright v. Ron We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00758
Petitioner: Kevin Gail Bright
Respondent: Ron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?