Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Pittman v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2009cv01170
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman
Respondent:
B. A. Bledsoe, F. Gambone, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WYNN v. DODRILL
as 2:2009cv01917
Petitioner:
MACK WYNN
Respondent:
D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vallejo v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv02662
Petitioner:
Ramiro R Vallejo
Respondent:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, S Beachamp, Sabrina Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 1:2008cv01135
Petitioner:
David Kissi
Respondent:
Paul Clement, Harley Lappin, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin A. Armstrong v. Jeff Grondolsky, et al
as 08-2851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, REGIONAL DIRECTOR BOP PHILADELPHIA and JEFF GRONDOISKY, REGIONAL DIRECTOR BOP PHILADELPHIA
McLendon v. Shartle et al
as 4:2008cv01495
Petitioner:
Juan P McLendon
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle, D. Scott Dodrill and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOSEPH YOUNG v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv02653
Petitioner:
JOSEPH YOUNG
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, D. SCOTT DODRILL, J. GRANDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Corral v. Samuels, et al
as 08-2444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PABLO FAVELA CORRAL
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY BOYCE, DHO, D. SCOTT DODRILL, DHO, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, DHO and others
Armstrong v. Grondolsky, et al
as 08-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOISKY, WARDEN and D. SCOTT DODRILL, REGIONAL DIRECTOR BOP PHILADELPHIA
Smith v. Dodrill et al
as 4:2007cv02295
Petitioner:
Benjamin Smith
Respondent:
D. Scott Dodrill, Cameron Lindsay, Frank Karam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
