Cases 21 - 30 of 238
Nunez-Reyes v. Attorney General
as 9:2023cv80359
Plaintiff:
William Nunez-Reyes
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez-Reyes v. Attorney General
as 9:2023cv80360
Plaintiff:
William Nunez-Reyes
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez-Reyes v. Secretary of the Department of Corrections
as 9:2023cv80361
Defendant:
William Nunez-Reyes and Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Triggs-Nunez
as 2:2022at01209
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Triggs-Nunez v. Cates
as 2:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Triggs-Nunez
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Maricopa County Attorney et al
as 2:2022cv01939
Petitioner:
Frank Nunez
Respondent:
Maricopa County Attorney, Arizona, State of, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivan Nunez v. Rick Hill
as 22-16585
Petitioner / Appellant:
IVAN M. NUNEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL, Warden
Nunez v. Lumpkin
as 22-40659
Petitioner / Appellant:
Neftali Nunez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Nunez Perez v. Escobar Pabon, et al
as 22-1749
Petitioner:
DAVID NUNEZ-PEREZ and DAVID NUNEZ PEREZ
Respondent:
HECTOR HERNANDEZ-MORALES, Warden, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ANA I. ESCOBAR, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and others
Nunez v. Hill
as 4:2022cv04881
Petitioner:
Ivan Mark Nunez
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
