Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Binet v. Decker
as 4:2019cv01815
Respondent:
Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Hector Lenny Caba Binet
Defendant:
William P. Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bob v. DHS et al
as 1:2019cv10422
Respondent:
ICE, DHS and Ins. Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Nata S. Bob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Raheem v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv19300
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM
Respondent:
Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden, Medical Defendants (John Doe) and H.O. THOMAS DECKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS et al v. DECKER et al
as 2:2019cv19302
Respondent:
Medical Defendants (John Doe), H.O. THOMAS DECKER and Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden
Petitioner:
YUSUF RAHEEM, NATA S. BOB and KENNETH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosemond v. Decker et al
as 7:2019cv09657
Petitioner:
Jean Rosemond
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Bob v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv09590
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden and Medical Defendants (John Doe)
Petitioner:
Nata S. Bob
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Raheem v. Decker et al
as 1:2019cv09591
Petitioner:
Yusuf Raheem
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, Hudson County Corrections & Rehabilitation (Jail) Warden and Medical Defendants (John Doe)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
AG v. Decker
as 7:2019cv09535
Respondent:
Thomas Decker
Petitioner:
Ousmane AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pacheco Uzho v. McAleena et al
as 2:2019cv18559
Respondent:
H.O. THOMAS DECKER, WILLIAM P. BARR, Kevin McAleena and others
Petitioner:
Juan Manual Pacheco Uzho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raheem v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv09134
Petitioner:
Yusuf Raheem
Respondent:
Thomas Decker, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin McAlleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
