Cases 31 - 40 of 5,380
Bango, Noel v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80132
Plaintiff:
Noel K. Bango
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8009
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity a/k/a Neicole Molden
Chalker v. Painter
as 1:2024cv01366
Petitioner:
Justin S. Chalker
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tavoris Simmons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10490
Petitioner:
TAVORIS K. SIMMONS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jones v. Nelson, Warden
as 2:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Kemonie Lashawn Jones
Respondent:
K. Nelson, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carlos Hernandez v. Joshua Stein
as 24-6131
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
JOSHUA STEIN and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryan Widmer v. Jossette Okereke
as 24-3054
Petitioner:
RYAN K. WIDMER
Respondent:
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
