Cases 31 - 40 of 629
(HC) Gomez v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01001
Petitioner:
Ascencion Gomez
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00637
Petitioner:
Edgardo Gomez
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robles v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwayne McCoy v. David Gomez
as 23-1984
Petitioner / Appellant:
DWAYNE MCCOY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID GOMEZ
Dixon v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Dante Dixon
Respondent:
S. Lovett, P. Boch, K. Bigart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Amin v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Sundiata El-Amin
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, P. Boch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Ronito Caurice Gomez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez-Moreno v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Juan A. Gomez-Moreno
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Gomez Cruz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00664
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Gomez Cruz
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Eris Bermudez-Gomez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11023
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIS BERMUDEZ-GOMEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
