Cases 31 - 40 of 5,381
Tavoris Simmons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10490
Petitioner:
TAVORIS K. SIMMONS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Poe v. Cogliati
as 5:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brian Sheldon Poe
Defendant:
Syda K. Cogliati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Hernandez v. Joshua Stein
as 24-6131
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
JOSHUA STEIN and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
Scott v. Joseph
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott
Respondent:
K. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bango, Noel v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80132
Plaintiff:
Noel K. Bango
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8002
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity a/k/a Neicole Molden
Jones v. Nelson, Warden
as 2:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Kemonie Lashawn Jones
Respondent:
K. Nelson, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
