Cases 31 - 40 of 3,012
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kengne v. The Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01992
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
The Fulton County Jail and Sheriff Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Demari D. Lee
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trejo v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Prose et al
as 1:2024cv00779
Petitioner:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Respondent:
Susan Prose and Denver Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Sheriff, Eastland County Texas
as 4:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Jason Derrell Cooper
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Sheriff, Eastland County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Sheriff
as 9:2024cv00618
Petitioner:
Keith Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff
as 24-8020
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, a/k/a Levi Dominguez
Phillip Owens v. Christian Newton
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
PHILLIP OWENS
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN E. NEWTON, Sheriff, Huntington County Jail
Kevin Dunston v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv03574
Petitioner:
Kevin Dunston
Respondent:
State of California, The County of Los Angeles, Pasadena Superior Ct. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
