Cases 31 - 40 of 1,394
Lask v. Watson
as 3:2023cv01381
Petitioner:
Richard Lask
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
Tyrell Antoine Jones
Respondent:
Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Martin v. Tom Lawson, et al
as 23-15835
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
TOM LAWSON, Chief, Nevada Division Parole and Probation, STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Northern v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03131
Petitioner:
Shedrick Northern
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Spangler
as 3:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
Cory Davis
Respondent:
Unknown
Defendant:
Tom Spangler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Revilla v. Reich
as 1:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Julian Revilla
Respondent:
Tom Reich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Watson
as 3:2023cv00861
Petitioner:
James M. Howard
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv02552
Petitioner:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burchett v. Bates
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene S. Burchett
Respondent:
Tom Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Watson
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Robert Bowen
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
