Cases 41 - 50 of 22,152
(HC) Williams v. Morales
as 2:2024cv02306
Petitioner:
Henry Don Williams
Respondent:
R. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gay v. Lilley
as 1:2024cv06424
Petitioner:
William Gay
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 5:2024cv04488
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROBERT ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Secretary Department of Corrections (Pinellas)
as 8:2024cv02009
Petitioner:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Johnston County
as 5:2024hc02153
Respondent:
Johnston County
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Artis
as 2:2024cv12244
Petitioner:
Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Fredeane Artis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Acosta v. Buesgen
as 2:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
William Acosta
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Williams
as 1:2024cv07558
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Petitioner:
Sam Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Eldridge et al
as 1:2024cv01402
Petitioner:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and William A. Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00436
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael William Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
