General Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Booth v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00747
Petitioner: Ricky Dewayne Booth
Respondent: Willie Thomas and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edward Booth v. Darrel Adams, et al
as 12-55433
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD BOOTH
Respondent - Appellee: DARREL ADAMS, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and RAUL LOPEZ, Warden
Booth v. Graber
as 4:2011cv00596
Petitioner: Michael David Booth
Respondent: Conrad M Graber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Albright We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00315
Petitioner: Virginia Booth Smith
Respondent: Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booth v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02361
Petitioner: Edward Booth
Respondent: Darrel Adams and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Tamez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00110
Petitioner: Franklin L. Williams
Respondent: Rebeca Tamez and Edmund Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOOTH v. MCNEIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00314
Petitioner: SAMUEL BOOTH
Respondent: WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Booth v. Hartley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02214
Petitioner: Richard Booth
Respondent: James Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick Booth v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-15653
Petitioner - Appellant: PATRICK J. BOOTH
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and BENEDETTI
Horne v. Booth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00739
Plaintiff: Alfred Horne
Defendant: Bernard Booth, Greta M. Harris, Mississippi State Hops and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?